What is OP-CEDAW?
Text of OP-CEDAW

Signatories and States Parties
Becoming a States Party

The "Opt-Out" Clause

Examples of Ratification Processes

Benefits

Entering into force

Government concerns

 

Issues and Concerns Addressed during Negotiations of the OP-CEDAW

 

Some Reasons Governments Should Become State Parties to the OP-CEDAW

Role of MPs

Tips for NGOs

Administration
Communications Procedure
Inquiry Procedure
Practical Application
OP-CEDAW Remedies
Relevant Case Law
"Our Rights are Not Optional"
FAQs

 

www
iwraw asia pacific



 


Some Reasons Governments Should Become States Parties to the OP-CEDAW

The following arguments in favour of the OP-CEDAW may be used to support your advocacy efforts:

1) The OP-CEDAW will help strengthen national level capacity to deal with discrimination against women. The OP-CEDAW procedures are available as a “last resort.” The communications and inquiry procedures are only meant to be used when domestic protection processes fail to address gaps in national laws and policies. The recommendations of the CEDAW Committee are meant to add to national level efforts to implement the CEDAW Convention effectively.

2) All Constitutions contain provisions on non-discrimination and equality that should be interpreted in light of the CEDAW Convention. Since constitutional provisions for equality and equal protection are being implemented, governments should not fear an “overflow” of complaints under the communications procedure. Moreover, in most instances, national human rights mechanisms are already mandated to address grave and systematic violations of women’s human rights. For this reason, the OP-CEDAW procedures should be seen as “back-up” measures aiming to ensure the realisation of constitutional rights for all women.

3) The OP-CEDAW is the first international gender-specific human rights procedure available. Ratification will fulfil the international commitment made during the Fourth World Conference on Women and demonstrate the government’s dedication to the promotion of women’s human rights.

4) The final text of the OP-CEDAW was adopted as the result of political compromises. Governments already have had their objections addressed during the drafting process and should be assured that the text reflects their concerns. It should also be noted that all member States of the United Nations adopted the final text by consensus.

5) The OP-CEDAW gives the CEDAW Committee the opportunity to further develop the normative content of all rights contained in the CEDAW Convention. In addition, by reviewing specific situations under the OP-CEDAW procedures, the CEDAW Committee will be in a position to clarify the specific nature of the obligation. This will in turn assist governments gain greater awareness of the nature of their duties under the CEDAW Convention.

6) Recommendations by the CEDAW Committee are not legally enforceable. The final views of the Committee will be issued and implemented in light of the spirit of constructive dialogue among States Parties to CEDAW and the CEDAW Committee. The OP-CEDAW procedures do not undermine the principle of State sovereignty.

7) The OP-CEDAW ratification process provides an opportunity to generate greater awareness of the CEDAW Convention at the national level. In addition, governments should raise awareness on the OP-CEDAW upon ratification/accession. These processes should contribute to better implementation and greater ownership of the CEDAW Convention by government officials and civil society.

8) Discussions on the ratification/accession of the OP-CEDAW will provide an opportunity for government bodies to discuss the adequateness of resources available for the promotion of women’s human rights. It is also important to note that special attention should be paid to financial and human resources available to ensure the effective implementation of the CEDAW Committee. At another level, financial contributions by governments to enhance the work of the CEDAW Committee should also be considered.

9) By supporting the ratification of the OP-CEDAW and promoting the implementation of the recommendations of the CEDAW Committee, all government bodies will be expressing their commitment and political will to promote women’s human rights.

10) Greater public awareness on the CEDAW Convention and the OP-CEDAW resulting from the ratification/accession of the OP-CEDAW will put women at ease. Women will be reassured that their government is committed to realising women’s human rights and that the provision of remedies and redress of violations experienced by women is a priority.

11) The ratification of or accession to the OP-CEDAW is likely to give momentum to debates on women’s access to justice. These debates are likely to trigger changes in national laws, policies and procedures.


Source: These arguments were originally developed by NGOs during the negotiations of the OP-CEDAW and were later adapted and further developed for IWRAW Asia Pacific by the NYU Law School Human Rights Clinic.


This page was last updated on August 16, 2004

“IWRAW Asia Pacific is an independent, non-profit, NGO in Special consultative status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations.”
©IWRAW Asia Pacific
Contact Us | Site Map