What is OP-CEDAW?
Text of OP-CEDAW
Signatories and States Parties
Becoming a States Party
Administration

Communications Procedure

 Chart

Overview

Key Considerations

Submission Guidelines

Views / Decisions

Inquiry Procedure
Practical Application
OP-CEDAW Remedies
Relevant Case Law
"Our Rights are Not Optional"
FAQs
 

www
iwraw asia pacific


 


Views / Decisions

In this section you will find the views/decisions of the CEDAW Committee under the OP-CEDAW Communications Procedure:

  • B.J. v. Germany , 1/2003
  • A.T. v. Hungary , 2/2003
  • Rahime Kayhan v Turkey , 8/2005
  • Dung Thi Thuy Nguyen v. Netherlands , 3/2004
  • Andrea Szijjarto v. Hungary , 4/2004
  • Sahide Goekce (deceased) v. Austria, 5/2005
  • Fatma Yildirim (deceased) v. Austria, 6/2005
  • Cristina Muñoz-Vargas y Sainz de Vicuña v. Spain 7/2005
  • N.S.F. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, 10/2005
  • Constance Ragan Salgado v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, 11/2006
 

This page was last updated on March 25, 2008

“IWRAW Asia Pacific is an independent, non-profit, NGO in Special consultative status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations.”
©IWRAW Asia Pacific
Contact Us | Site Map