Why CEDAW?

Special features of the CEDAW Convention

Problems & solutions

Governments & CEDAW
NGOs & CEDAW

 

www
iwraw asia pacific



 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Problems and Solutions

The Reporting Process: The reporting process is the government's responsibility and women are excluded from this. More often than not, the government report is not made available to women and some States parties do not even present reports. The reports, however, may be obtained from the United Nations (e.g. on the website of the Division for the Advancement of Women). While, unofficially, the CEDAW Committee receives alternative reports from women's groups, States parties need to be encouraged to allow for women's perspectives in their official reports.

Reservations[1]: The problem of reservations is critical. Article 16 which pertains to the rights of women in the family, and article 5 which deals with custom and culture are the most reserved articles. The provision for reservations is considered essential to facilitate the gradual acceptance of the full equality between men and women, but it has been used by some States to negate the very spirit of the CEDAW Convention. At present, there is no mechanism within the UN, to regulate the practice of reservations or to bar reservations that undermine the basic principles of treaties. International and national advocacy is needed to redress this problem.

Since its inception the CEDAW Committee has been preoccupied with the issue of reservations. The legal opinion issued by the UN Secretariat is that neither the CEDAW Committee nor the Secretary General has the right to consider the compatibility of reservations and this has been a much-debated issue in the CEDAW Committee meetings. The Committee has formulated General Recommendation 4 which expresses concern at the significant number of substantive reservations.

The CEDAW Committee does not underrate the significant challenge that reservations to the substantive provisions pose to its work and the objectives of the CEDAW Convention. At the same time, it sees the pattern of reservations as a manifestation of this treaty's significance as an instrument of change. Even reserving States are brought within the monitoring system and their performance in advancing the condition of women is subject to external scrutiny.

Nevertheless, according to a 1995 report by the CEDAW Committee, it was rather encouraged by the number of withdrawal of reservations where States parties decided that reservations were not necessary or where steps had been taken by the States in order that their obligation under the CEDAW Convention could be fulfilled.

Interpretation of articles: The interpretation of the articles is left to the State and this can result in narrow definitions of rights, and analysis of problems and remedies. Often there is a very weak application of the articles. There has to be a sharper articulation of the content of the articles and the action that needs to be taken within the framework of the CEDAW Convention. Women have to take on this role. Since within the system, there is provision for the CEDAW Committee to formulate General Recommendations to give broader meaning to the articles, this can be used to develop jurisprudence in relation to the convention. Women could also give feedback to the CEDAW Committee regarding the topics on which General Recommendations need to be developed and as well as suggestions on the substance.

Indicators: There are no clear indicators of the successes which are the outcome of the implementation of the CEDAW Convention. How is State action in this regard evaluated? There is a need to develop indicators of fulfilment of State obligation and the development of an adequate database through which the implementation of the convention can be monitored. Women have to get involved at the local level in all these activities.

[1] Source: UN Division for the Advancement of Women 1995 Report by the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women.

 

Printer friendly format

 

Back to top

 

This page was last updated on July 25, 2003

“IWRAW Asia Pacific is an independent, non-profit, NGO in Special consultative status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations.”
©IWRAW Asia Pacific
Contact Us | Site Map